Opinion
The Supreme Court’s Presidential Immunity Ruling Undermines Democracy
The ruling in Trump v. United States is an affront to democracy and the rule of law, forfeiting critical checks on executive power. It undermines criminal accountability for presidents if their law-breaking occurs in the course of “official” conduct,
"It is incredibly difficult to argue that the Alabama Constitution allows the Governor to change the law or to suspend the ...
The justices will consider whether a 2005 law that gives gun makers broad immunity applies in the case, which accuses them of ...
His latest brief in the January 6 case inadvertently suggests how a future President Trump could cling to power through ...
If presidents know that faithfully performing their duty is an option rather than an obligation, it is no longer a duty.
The expanded brief Special Counsel Jack Smith filed with DC District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan is -- on the surface -- a ...
Supreme Court justices will take the bench Monday for the first time since issuing blockbuster decisions on guns, abortion and presidential immunity.
The district attorney filed a brief urging the court to turn down a request from Trump's former chief of staff.
The Senate heard competing interpretations of the Supreme Court's immunity decision for Donald Trump ranging from 'alarming' ...
Special counsel Jack Smith laid out a detailed road map to his federal 2020 election subversion case against former President ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback