Why has a three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court overturned the Allahabad High Court's judgment on the validity of the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004?
For amending Constitution One needs majority's crown Till then the h Can always water it down Bleeding hearts for the poor ...
Does the outgoing Chief Justice of India represent the emergence of a New Right in India, one that is modern and yet able to rely on a norm above the Constitution to perform the judicial function, ...
Justice D.Y. Chandrachud’s conduct raises serious questions about the sufficiency of ethical standards for Supreme Court ...
In the Calcutta HC, a matter of sacrifice to Kali and ‘essential religious practice’ of Hinduism
A public interest litigation has been filed by Akhil Bharat Krishi Goseva Sangh before the Calcutta High Court to stop animal ...
AT the Bombay High Court in Mumbai, the appellate-side Bar association is known as the ‘Advocates Association of Western ...
The recent history of Delhi University is symptomatic of the weakening of democracy in India but in the activism of students, ...
On his appointment as the 51st Chief Justice of India, a look at Justice Sanjiv Khanna’s journey through the judiciary. — ON ...
The genesis of the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution lies in the legislative intent of the Constituent Assembly ...
Sardar Patel would have asked Prime Minister Narendra Modi to revisit his ideas on secularism and a secular state articulated ...
Part 2 of the four-part series revisiting the question of dual citizenship in India in view of the Supreme Court judgment on ...
Although Sukanya Shantha versus Union of India is a welcome judgment, a more nuanced and multi-faceted approach is needed to address discriminatory practices and the caste-based hierarchies within ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback